A Vision of Spiritual Society
It is this kingdom of God within,
the result of the finding of God not in a distant heaven but within ourselves, of which the state of society in an age of the
Truth, spiritual age, would be the result and the external figure.
Therefore
a society which was even initially spiritualised, would make the revealing and
finding of the divine Self in man the whole first aim of all its activities,
its education, its knowledge, its science, its ethics, its art, its economical
and political structure. As it was to some extent in the ancient Vedic times with the
cultural education of the higher classes, so it would be then with all
education. It would embrace all
knowledge in its scope, but would make the whole trend and aim and the
permeating spirit not mere worldly efficiency, but this self-developing and
self-finding. It would pursue physical
and psychical science not in order merely to know the world and Nature in her
processes and to use them for material human ends, but to know through and in
and under and over all things the Divine in the world and the ways of the
Spirit in its masks and behind them. It
would make it the aim of ethics not to establish a rule of action whether
supplementary to the social law or partially corrective of it, the social law
that is after all only the rule, often clumsy and ignorant, of the biped pack,
the human herd, but to develop the divine nature in the human being. It would make it the aim of Art nor merely to
present images of the subjective and objective world, but to see them with the
significant and creative vision that goes behind their appearances
and to reveal the Truth and Beauty of which things visible to us and invisible
are the forms, the masks or the symbols and significant figures.
A spiritualised society
would treat in its sociology the individual, from the saint to the criminal,
not as units of a social problem to be passed through some skilfully devised
machinery and either flattened into the social mould or crushed out of it, but
as souls suffering and entangled in a net and to be rescued, souls growing and
to be encouraged to grow, souls grown and from whom help and power can be drawn
by the lesser spirits who are not yet adult.
The aim of its economics would be not to create a huge engine of
production, whether of the competitive or the co-operative kind, but to give to
men — not only to some but to all men each in his highest possible measure —
the joy of work according to their own nature and free leisure to grow
inwardly, as well as a simply rich and beautiful life for all. In its politics it would not regard the
nations within the scope of their own internal life as enormous State machines
regulated and armoured with man living for the sake of the machine and worshipping
it as his God and his larger self, content at the first call to kill others
upon its altar and to bleed there himself so that the machine may remain intact
and powerful and be made ever larger, more complex, more cumbrous, more
mechanically efficient and entire. Neither would it be content to maintain these nations or
States in their mutual relations as noxious engines meant to discharge
poisonous gas upon each other in peace and to rush in times of clash upon each
other’s armed hosts and unarmed millions, full of belching shot and men missioned to murder like hostile tanks in a modern
battlefield. It would regard the peoples
as group-souls, the Divinity concealed and to be self-discovered in its human collectivities, group-souls meant like the individual to
grow according to their own nature and by that growth to help each other, to
help the whole race in the one common work of humanity. And that work would be to find the divine
Self in the individual and the collectivity and to realise spiritually,
mentally, vitally, materially its greatest, largest, richest and deepest
possibilities in the inner life of all and their outer action and nature.
For it
is into the Divine within each man and each people that the man and the nation
have to grow; it is not an external idea or rule that has to be imposed on them
from without. Therefore the law of a
growing inner freedom is that which will be most honoured in the spiritual age
of mankind. True it is that so long as man
has not come within measurable distance of self-knowledge and has not set his
face towards it, he cannot escape from the law of external compulsion and all
his efforts to do so must be vain. He is
and always must be, so long as that lasts, the slave of others, the slave of
his family, his caste, his clan, his Church, his society, his nation; and he
cannot but be that and they too cannot help throwing their crude and mechanical
compulsion on him, because he and they are the slaves of their own ego, of
their own lower nature. We must feel and
obey the compulsion of the Spirit if we would establish our inner right to
escape other compulsion; we must make our lower nature the willing slave, the
conscious and illumined instrument or the ennobled but still self-subjected
portion, consort or partner of the divine Being within us, for it is that
subjection which is the condition of our freedom, since spiritual freedom is
not the egoistic assertion of our separate mind and life but obedience to the
Divine Truth in ourself and our members and in all
around us. But we have, even so, to remark
that God respects the freedom of the natural members of our being and the he
gives them room to grow in their own nature so that by natural growth and not
by self-extinction they may find the Divine in themselves. The subjection which they
finally accept, complete and absolute, must be a willing subjection of recognition
and aspiration to their own source of light and power and their highest being. Therefore even in the unregenerated state we find that the healthiest, the
truest, the most living growth and action is that which arises in the largest
possible freedom and that all excess of compulsion is either the law of a
gradual atrophy or a tyranny varied or cured by outbreaks of rabid
disorder. And as soon as man comes to
know his spiritual self, he does by that discovery, often even by the very
seeking for it, as ancient thought and religion saw, escape from the outer law
and enter into the law of freedom.
A spiritual age of mankind
will perceive this truth. It will not
try to make man perfect by machinery or keep him straight by tying up all his
limbs. It will not present to the member
of the society his higher self in the person of the policeman, the official and
the corporal , nor, let us say, in the form of a
socialistic bureaucracy or a Labour Soviet.
Its aim will be to diminish as soon and as far as possible the element
of external compulsion in human life by awakening the inner divine compulsion
of the Spirit within and all the preliminary means it will use will have that
for its aim. In the end it will employ
chiefly if not solely the spiritual compulsion which even the spiritual
individual can exercise on those around him, — and how much more should a
spiritual society be able to do it, — that which awakens within us in spite of
all inner resistance and outer denial the compulsions of the Light, the desire
and the power to grow through one’s own nature into the Divine. For the perfectly spiritualised society will
be one in which, as is dreamed by the spiritual anarchist, all men will be deeply free, and it
will be so because the preliminary condition will have been satisfied. In that state each man will be not a law to
himself, but the law, the divine Law,
because he will be a soul living in the Divine and not an ego living mainly if
not entirely for its own interest and purpose.
His life will be led by the law of his own divine nature liberated from
the ego.
Nor will that mean a
breaking up of all human society into the isolated action of individuals; for
the third word of the Spirit is unity.
The spiritual life is the flower not of a featureless but a conscious
and diversified oneness. Each man has to
grow into the Divine within himself through his own individual being, therefore
is a certain growing measure of freedom a necessity of the being as it develops
and perfect freedom the sign and the condition of the perfect life. But also, the Divine whom he thus sees in
himself, he sees equally in all others and as the same Spirit in all. Therefore too is a growing inner unity with
others a necessity of his being and perfect unity the sign and condition of the
perfect life. Not only to see and find
the Divine in oneself, but to see and find the Divine in all, not only to seek
one’s own individual liberation or perfection, but to seek the liberation and
perfection of others is the complete law of the spiritual being. If the divinity sought were a separate
godhead within oneself and not the one Divine, or if one sought God for oneself
alone, then indeed the result might be a grandiose egoism, the Olympian egoism
of a Goethe or the Titanic egoism imagined by Nietzsche, or it might be the
isolated self-knowledge or asceticism of the ivory tower or the Stylites pillar. But
he, who sees God in all, will serve freely God in all with the service of love.
He will, that is to say, seek not only his own freedom, but the freedom of all,
not only his own perfection, but the perfection of all. He will not feel his individuality perfect
except life except as it is one with the universal life. He will not live
either for himself or for the State and society, for the individual ego or the
collective ego, but for something much greater, for God in himself and for the
Divine in the universe.
The spiritual age will be
ready to set in when the common mind of man begins to be alive to these truths
and to be moved or desire to be moved by this triple or triune Spirit. That will mean the turning of the cycle of
social development which we have been considering out of its incomplete
repetitions on a new upward line towards its goal. For having set out, according to our
supposition, with a symbolic age, an age in which man felt a great Reality
behind all life which he sought through symbols, it will reach an age in which
it will begin to live in that Reality, not through the symbol, not by the power
of the type or of the convention or of the individual reason and intellectual
will, but in our own highest nature which will be the nature of that Reality
fulfilled in the conditions — not necessarily the same as now — of terrestrial
existence. This is what the religions
have seen with a more or less adequate intuition, but most often as in a glass
darkly, that which they called the kingdom of God on earth, — his kingdom within
in men’s spirit and therefore, for the one is the material result of the effectivity of the other, his kingdom without in the life
of the peoples.